Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher

• Antecol, E. H., & Ozbeklik, S. (2015). The effect of teacher gender on students achievement in primary school. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(1), 63-89. https://doi.org/10.1086/677391
• Antoro, R. J., Samosir, R. S., Kavling, P. S., & Indonesia, J. E. (2015). Trigonometry learning system with interactive multimedia for senior high school class XI. The Second International Conference on Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Education Technology (pp. 12-16). Malaysia: The Society of Digital Information and Wireless Communication (SDIWC) USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1655925.1656042
• Barlow, A. T., Watson, L. A., Tessema, A. A., Lischka, A. E., & Strayer, J. F. (2018, April). Carefully select and leverage student errors for whole - class discussion to benefit the learning of all. Teaching children mathematiccs, 24(6), 384-391. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.24.6.0384
• Brijlall, D. (2014). Exploring the pedagogical content knowledge for teaching probability in middle school: A South Africa case study. Internal Journal of Education and Science, 7(3), 719-726.
• Brown, L. I., & Kanyongo, G. Y. (2010). Gender and differences in mathematics performance in Trinidad and Tobago examining affective factors. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(3), 113-130. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285943823
• Clements, M. A. (1980). Analyzing childrend’s errors on written mathematical task. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1-21.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural science (2nd Ed.) Lawrence Erlbaum.
• De Vos, A. S. (2002). Research at grass roots: For the social sciences and human services professions. Van Schaik Publisher.
• Debra, S. L. (2017). Gender, self -concept and Mathematics and Science performance of South Africa Grade 9 students. Bereau for Economic Research, 1-48.
• Durkheim, E. K. (1999). Quantitative measurement. Applied Method for the Social Sciences, 72-95.
• Effandi, Z., Chin, L. C., & Daud, Y. (2010, 30 March 2010). Analysis of students’ error in learning quadratic equations. international Education Studies, 6(2), 272-275. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.272.275
• Fanning, J. D. (2016). Students responses to instruction in rational trigonometry. Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 39(7), 857-878.
• Fi, D. C. (2003). Preservice secondary school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of trigonometry: subject matter conttent knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and envisioned pedagogy. Iowa Research Online, 1-331.
• Forgasz, H. J. (2015). Gender and Mathematics in Australia: A downward trajectory. The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on mathematics education (pp. 156-161). Australia: Monash University. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_12
• Fraekel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in education. Jossey.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th Ed.). McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
• Gaisman, M. T. (2015). Gender and mathematics education in Mexico. The proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematics Education (pp. 151-153). Monash University. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_12
• Gorard, S. (2001). Quantitative methods of in educational research. Journal of Sociology of Education, 42(3), 309-321. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v5i2.9532
• Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoreticcal framework in dessertaqtion research: creating the blueprint for our “House”. Admistrative Issues Journal, 12-26. https://doi.org/10.5929/2014.4.2.9
• Gur, H. (2009). Trigonometry learning. New Horizons, 67-80.
• Kissane, B., & Kemp, M. (2009). Teaching and learning trigonometry with technology. 14th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics (pp. 17-21). Beijing Normal University.
• Kissane, B., & Kemp, M. (2010). Teaching and Learning Trigonometry with Technology. ResearchGate, 1-10.
• Lai, C.-F. (2006). Error analysis in mathamtics. Behavioral research and teaching. http://brt.uoregon.edu
• Lancaster, G., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P. R. (2004). Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for goof practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x
• Leder, G. (2015). Gender and mathematics education revisited. The Processings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematics Education (pp. 145-146). Monash University. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_12
• Lumbantobing, H. (2018). The effect of interactive computer program on students accomplishment in teaching trigonometry. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 38-48.
• Lund, T. (2012). Combining qualitative approach: Some argument for mixed methods research. Scandinavian Journal for Mixed Method Research, 56(2), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.568674
• Marinas, F. N., & Clements, M. A. (1990). Understanding the problem: A prerequisite to problem solving in mathematics. Journal of Science and Mathemataics Education in South Eaast Asia, 13(1), 14-20.
• Mensah, J. K. (2017). Ghanaian senior high school students’ error in learning of trigonometry. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 1709-1717.
• Ministry of Education. (2010a). Teaching syllabus for core mathematics (Senior High School, 1-3). Accra: Ministry of Education.
• Ministry of Education. (2010b). Teaching syllabus for elective mathematics (Senior High School, 1-3). Accra: Ministry of Education.
• Ministry of Education. (2014). Secondary Education Improvement Project (SEIP) project implementation manual. Accra: Ministry of Education.
• Muzangwa, J., & Chifamba, P. (2012). Analysis of errors and miscocnetpions in the learning of calculus by undergraduate students. Acta Dictactica Napocensia, 5(2), 1-19.
• Nayak, J. K., & Singh, P. (2015). Fundamentals of research methodology. New Delhi (India): SSDN Publishers and Distributions.
• Newman, A. M. (1977). Analysis of sixth - grade pupils’ errors on written mathematical tasks. Victorian: Institute for Educational Research Bulletin, 31-43.
• Norasiah, A. (2002). Error type diagonsis in learning simultaneous equations (Unpublished master of education research project), University of Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
• Prakitipong, N., & Nakamura, S. (2006). Analysis of mathematics performance of grade five students in Thailand using Newmans procedure. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 9(1), 111-122. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.036
• Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teacher, school and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
• Rushton, S. J. (2018). Teaching and learning mathematics through error analysis. Journal of Cheminformatics, 3(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40928-0009-Y
• Saavedra, R., & Garcia Belaude, S. (2010). Building educators awareness and knowledge of strategies to promote equity in the math classroom. APEC Conference on Replicating Exemplary Practices in Mathematics Education. Thailand.
• Saleh, Y. K., As’ari, D. I., & Abdur, R. (2017). Error Analysis solving problems analogies by Newman procedure using analogical reasoning. International Journal of Humanities of Social Sciences, 9(1), 17-26.
• Sapire, I., Shalem, Y., Wilson-Thompson, B., & Paulsen, R. (2016). Engaging with learners’ errors when teaching mathematics. Pythagoras, 37(1), 331-353. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v37i1.331
• Sarwadi, H. H., & Shahrill, M. (2014). understanding students’ mathematical errors and misconceptions: The case of year 11 repeating students. International Scientific Publications and consulting services, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5899/2014/metr-00051
• Shelley, J. (2016). Gender isssues in mathematics education in Tanzania. ResearchGate, 1-20.
• Singhatat, N. (1991). Analysis of mathematics errors of lower secondary pupils in solving word problems. SEAMEO-RECSAM.
• Skane, M. E., & Graeber, A. O. (1993). A conceptual change model implemented with college students: distributive law misconceptions. Third International Coference on Misconcepttions in Science and Mathematics, (pp. 16-25). Ithaca.
• Stockemer, D. (2019). Quantitative Methods for the Social Sciences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99118-4
• Unal, M. (2017). Preferences of teaching methods and techniques in mathematics with reasons. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 194-202.
• Usman, H. M., & Muhammed, M. H. (2017). Analysis of Students’ error in learning of trigonometry among seniorsecondary school students in Zaria Metropolis, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 13(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.9790/5728-1302040104
• Welber, K. (2008). Teaching trigonometric functions: lessons learned from research. Mathematics Teachers, 102(2), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.102.2.0144
• Wilderger, N. J. (2007). A rational apporach to trigonometry. Math Horizons, 15(2), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1280.6488
• Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluka, T. (2012). The effect of dynamic mathematics software geogebra on student achievemen in teaching trigonometry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 183-187.

APA

Arhin, J., & Hokor, E. K. (2021). Analysis of High School Students’ Errors in Solving Trigonometry Problems. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 1(1), em003. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/11076

Vancouver

Arhin J, Hokor EK. Analysis of High School Students’ Errors in Solving Trigonometry Problems. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2021;1(1):em003. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/11076

AMA

Arhin J, Hokor EK. Analysis of High School Students’ Errors in Solving Trigonometry Problems. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2021;1(1), em003. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/11076

Chicago

Arhin, Jacob, and Evans Kofi Hokor. "Analysis of High School Students’ Errors in Solving Trigonometry Problems". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher 2021 1 no. 1 (2021): em003. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/11076

Harvard

Arhin, J., and Hokor, E. K. (2021). Analysis of High School Students’ Errors in Solving Trigonometry Problems. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 1(1), em003. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/11076

MLA

Arhin, Jacob et al. "Analysis of High School Students’ Errors in Solving Trigonometry Problems". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021, em003. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/11076