Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher

• Blandford, S. (2000). Managing professional development in schools. Routledge.
• Can, D. (2025). New education program in values education: Türkiye century maarif model. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 281-287. https://doi.org/10.20319/ictel.2025.281287
• Cansız, N., & Cansız, M., (2019). Evaluating Turkish science curriculum with PISA scientific literacy framework. Turkish Journal of Education, 8(3), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.545798
• DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355562
• Dragoş, V., & Mih, V. (2015). Scientific literacy in school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.273
• Effendi, D. N., Anggraini, W., Jatmiko, A., Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of scientific literacy using VOSviewer: Analysis of science education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), Article 012096. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012096
• European Education and Culture Executive Agency: Eurydice. (2011). Science education in Europe–National policies, practices and research. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/bae53054-c26c-4c9f-8366-5f95e2187634
• Fensham, P. J. (2009) Real world contexts in PISA science: Implications for context-based science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 884-896. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20334
• Genç, M. (2015). The effect of scientific studies on students’ scientific literacy and attitude. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty, 34(1), 141-152.
• Günaydin, Y. (2022). The predictive power of reading comprehension, attitude toward sciences, test technique, and science subject matter knowledge in predicting PISA scientific literacy test total score. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.136.9.6
• Harden, R. M., & Stamper, N. (1999). What is a spiral curriculum? Medical Teacher, 21(2), 141-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599979752
• Indriayu, M. (2018). The influence of science literacy-based teaching material towards science achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 7(3), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i3.14033
• Irez, S. (2009). Nature of science as depicted in Turkish biology textbooks. Science Education, 93(3), 422-447. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20305
• Khine, M. S., Fraser, B. J., Afari, E., & Liu, Y. (2022). Language learning environments and reading achievement among students in China: Evidence from PISA 2018 data. Learning Environments Research, 26, 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09404-8
• Kollas, S., & Halkia, K. (2020). Scientific literacy in second chance schools: Training science teachers to design context-based curricula. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4877-4890. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081060
• Kostøl, K. B., & Remmen, K. B. (2022). A qualitative study of teachers’ and students’ experiences with a context-based curriculum unit designed in collaboration with STEM professionals and science educators. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00066-x
• L’Heureux, K., Giamellaro, M., Beaudry, M.-C., Buxton3 , C., Ayotte-Beaudet, J.-P., & Alajmi, T. (2021). Learning to teach science from a contextualized stance. In Proceedings of the 2021 NARST International Conference Online. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003098478-39
• Lupión-Cobos, T., López-Castilla, R., & Blanco-López, Á. (2017). What do science teachers think about developing scientific competences through context-based teaching? A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 937-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1310412
• McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., Woods-McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Inquiry, engagement, and literacy in science: A retrospective, cross-national analysis using PISA 2006. Science Education, 98(6), 963-980. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21135
• MEB. (2004). Fen ve teknoloji dersi programı, ilköğretim 4.-5. sınıf [Science and technology course program, primary school 4th-5th grade]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
• MEB. (2013). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ve 8. Sınıflar [Science course curriculum, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
• MEB. (2017). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim program (ilkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Science course curriculum (primary and secondary school 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades)]. Bilim Akademisi. https://bilimakademisi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Fen-Bilimleri.pdf
• MEB. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim program (ilkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Science course curriculum (primary and secondary school 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades)]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937-FEN%20B%C4%B0L%C4%B0MLER%C4%B0%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI2018.pdf
• MEB. (2019). PISA 2018 Türkiye ön raporu [PISA 2018 Türkiye preliminary report]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. http://www.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_12/03105347_PISA_2018_Turkiye_on_raporu.pdf
• OECD. (2003). ‘Scientific literacy’ in the PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science, and problem solving knowledge and skills. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33694881.pdf
• OECD. (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2007/12/pisa-2006_g1gh866e.html
• OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
• OECD. (2019a). Future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/
• OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
• OECD. (2019c). PISA 2018 results (volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
• Planipolis. (n. d.). Turkey’s education vision 2023. Planipolis. https://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ressources/turkey_education_vision_2023.pdf
• Ramli, M., Susanti, B. H., Yohana, M. P., & Rozak, A. (2021). Assessing islamic junior high schools students’ scientific literacy using PISA released items. Journal of Physics. Conference Series, 1836, Article 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012068
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327
• She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and mathematics literacy: PISA for better school education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9911-1
• Sholikah, L., & Pertiwi, F. N. (2021). Analysis of science literacy ability of junior high school students based on programme for international student assessment (PISA). INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 2(1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v2i1.2922
• Sothayapetch, P., Lavonen, J., & Juuti, K. (2013). A comparative analysis of PISA scientific literacy framework in Finnish and Thai science curricula. Science Education International, 24(1), 78-97.
• Şad, S. N. (2012). Investigation of parental involvement tasks as predictors of primary students’ Turkish, math, and science & technology achievement. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, (48), 135-154.
• Tal, T., & Dierking, L. D. (2014), Learning science in everyday life. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21142
• Tamassia, L., & Frans, R. (2013). Does integrated science education improve scientific literacy? In J. Portela, I. Vale, F. Huckaby, & G. Bieger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23^rd Annual Conference of the European Teacher Education Network (pp. 132-141). The Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo.
• Tripathy, J. P. (2013). Secondary data analysis: Ethical issues and challenges. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 42(12), 1478-1479.
• Vahey, P., Vidiksis, R., & Adair, A. (2019). Increasing science literacy in early childhood the connection between home and school. American Educator, 42(4), 17-21.
• You, H. S., Park, S., & Delgado, C. (2021). A closer look at US schools: What characteristics are associated with scientific literacy? A multivariate multilevel analysis using PISA 2015. Science Education, 105(2), 406-437. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21609

APA

Örnek, F., & Alaam, S. (2025). Revisiting science education frameworks: Implications from PISA literacy findings in Türkiye, China, and OECD countries. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 5(4), em091. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/17058

Vancouver

Örnek F, Alaam S. Revisiting science education frameworks: Implications from PISA literacy findings in Türkiye, China, and OECD countries. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2025;5(4):em091. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/17058

AMA

Örnek F, Alaam S. Revisiting science education frameworks: Implications from PISA literacy findings in Türkiye, China, and OECD countries. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2025;5(4), em091. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/17058

Chicago

Örnek, Funda, and Shaima Alaam. "Revisiting science education frameworks: Implications from PISA literacy findings in Türkiye, China, and OECD countries". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher 2025 5 no. 4 (2025): em091. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/17058

Harvard

Örnek, F., and Alaam, S. (2025). Revisiting science education frameworks: Implications from PISA literacy findings in Türkiye, China, and OECD countries. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 5(4), em091. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/17058

MLA

Örnek, Funda et al. "Revisiting science education frameworks: Implications from PISA literacy findings in Türkiye, China, and OECD countries". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, vol. 5, no. 4, 2025, em091. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/17058