The impact of an online physics lab on university students' self-efficacy and understanding of thermal concepts during COVID-19 pandemic

Georgios Stylos; Antonios Christonasis; Konstantinos Georgopoulos; Konstantinos T. Kotsis

doi:10.29333/mathsciteacher/13701

Full Text (PDF)

Georgios Stylos ¹ ^* , Antonios Christonasis ¹ , Konstantinos Georgopoulos ¹ , Konstantinos T. Kotsis ¹

More Detail

¹ Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, GREECE^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

COVID-19 has caused widespread disruption, necessitating tough decisions for global economy and services, including one of the central social pillars, education. As in the rest of the world, Greek universities transformed and adapted their educational services to continue to operate during the pandemic. This article presents how a series of a physics laboratory work for thermal concepts was conducted to evaluate its effectiveness on students’ understanding and its impact on their self-efficacy beliefs. The results showed that the post-test performance on students’ understanding of thermal concepts and their self-efficacy beliefs levels toward physics teaching were higher than pre-test performance but still moderate. A critical challenge was to maintain the experiential consistency with the in-person laboratory classes of all the previous academic years and the promotion of group work of students.

Keywords

experiments
thermal concepts
self-efficacy
students

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2023, Volume 3, Issue 2, Article No: em049

https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13701

Publication date: 19 Sep 2023

Article Views: 415

Article Downloads: 238

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

American Physical Society. (2016). Phys21: Preparing physics students for 21^st century careers: A report by the joint task force on undergraduate physics programs. http://www.compadre.org/jtupp/docs/J-Tupp_Report.pdf
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Gazit, T., Bar-Ilan, J., Perez, O., Aharony, N., Bronstein, J., & Dyne, T. S. (2016). Psychological factors behind the lack of participation in online discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 268-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.009
Azar, A. (2010). In-service and pre-service secondary science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs about science teaching. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(4), 175-188.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bautista, N. U. (2011). Investigating the use of vicarious and mastery experiences in influencing early childhood education majors’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9232-5
Bleicher, R. E. (2004). Revisiting the STEBI-B: Measuring self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 104(8), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594. 2004.tb18004.x
Bong, M., Lee, S., & Wo, Y. (2015). The roles of interest and self-efficacy in the decision to pursue mathematics and science. In K. Renninger, M. Nieswandt, & S. Hidi (Eds.), Interest in mathematics and science learning (pp. 33-48). American Educational Research Association. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-42-4_2
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf
Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003
Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(3), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025974417256
Chen, P. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.008
Chini, J. J., Madsen, A., Gire, E., Rebello, N. S., & Puntambekar, S. (2012). Exploration of factors that affect the comparative effectiveness of physical and virtual manipulatives in an undergraduate laboratory. Physical Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010113. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.8.010113
Christonasis, A., & Kotsis, T. K. (2022). Observing or performing actions? Understanding circular motion via two types of learning activities. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(10), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i10.4493
Chu, H. E., Treagust, D. F., Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2012). Evaluation of students’ understanding of thermal concepts in everyday contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1509-1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.657714
Clough, M. P. (2002). Using the laboratory to enhance student learning. In R. W. Bybee (Ed.), Learning science and the science of learning (pp. 85-94). National Science Teachers Association.
Cooper, M. E., & Ferreira, J. M. (2009). Remote laboratories extending access to science and engineering curricular. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(4), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2009.43
Crouch, C. H., & Geller, B. (2023). Introductory physics for life sciences: Preparing and engaging students through authentic interdisciplinary connections. In M. F. Tasar, & P. R. L. Heron (Eds.), The international handbook of physics education research: Learning physics (pp. 20-21). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735425477_020
Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2006). Nonvoluntary class participation in graduate discussion courses: Effects of grading and cold calling. Journal of Management Education, 30(2), 354-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562905277031
Desouza, J. M. S., Boone, W. J., & Yilmaz, O. (2004). A study of science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs of teachers in India. Science Education, 88(6), 837-854. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20001
Dewhurst, D. N., Macleod, H., & Norris, T. A. (2000). Independent student learning aided by computers: An acceptable alternative to lectures? Computers & Education, 35(3), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1315(00)00033-6
DiBiase, D. (2000). Is distance teaching more work or less work? American Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640009527061
Dohn, N. B., Madsen, P. T., & Malte, H. (2009). The situational interest of undergraduate students in zoophysiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 33(3), 196-201. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00038.2009
Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science & Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman lectures on physics: Mainly mechanics, radiation, and heat. Basic Books.
Finn, H., Maxwell, M. A., & Calver, M. (2002). Why does experimentation matter in teaching ecology? Journal of Biological Education, 36(4), 158-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2002.9655826
Glen, S. (2020). Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR-20) & 21 (KR-21). Statistics how to: Statistics for the rest of us! https://www.statisticshowto.com/kuder-richardson/
Hidi, S., & Ainley, M. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships between two variables that influence learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 77-109). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Holmes, N. G., & Lewandowski, H. (2020). Investigating the landscape of physics laboratory instruction across North America. Physical Review, 16, 020162. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.020162
Hrastinski, S. (2009). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.
Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (1985). Student-student interaction: Ignored but powerful. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718503600406
Kestin, G., Miller, K. B., McCarty, L. S., Callaghan, K., & Deslauriers, L. (2020). Comparing the effectiveness of online versus live lecture demonstrations. Physical Review, 16, 013101. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.013101
Kuo, Y., Walker, A., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
Laukenmann, M. A., Bleicher, M. N., Fuss, S., Gläser-Zikuda, M., Mayring, P., & Von Rhöneck, C. (2003). An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning in physics instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210163233
Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1132960.1132961
Macias, M., Iveland, A., Tyler, B., & Salcido White, M. (2022a). Teaching K-8 science through distance learning: Overall impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Policy Brief.
Macias, M., Tyler, B., Iveland, A., & Rego, M. (2022b). Teaching K-8 science through distance learning: Specific challenges and successes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Policy Brief.
Mashnad, P. F. (2008). An alternate approach to pre-service teachers’ misconceptions about biology subject [Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Dallas].
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. C., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505824.pdf
Mehrotra, C., Hollister, C. D., & McGahey, L. (2001). Distance learning: Principles for effective design, delivery, and evaluation. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452232447
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
Mintzes, J. J., Marcum, B., Messerschmidt-Yates, C., & Mark, A. (2013). Enhancing self efficacy in elementary science teaching with professional learning communities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1201-1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9320-1
National Research Council. (2013). Adopting to a changing world: Challenges and opportunities in undergraduate physics education. National Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18312
Ojediran, I. A., Oludipe, D. I., & Ehindero, O. J. (2014). Impact of laboratory-based instructional intervention on the learning outcomes of low performing senior secondary students in physics. Creative Education, 5, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.54029
Okebukola, P. A. (1985). The relative effectiveness of cooperative and competitive interaction techniques in strengthening students’ performance in science classes. Science Education, 69(4), 501-509. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730690406
Owen, S., Dickson, D. P. E., Stanisstreet, M., & Boyes, E. D. (2008). Teaching physics: Students’ attitudes towards different learning activities. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140802036734
Palmer, D. H. (2001). Factors contributing to attitude exchange amongst preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 86(1), 122-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10007
Palmer, D. H. (2006a). Durability of changes in self-efficacy of preservice primary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 655-671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500404599
Palmer, D. H. (2006b). Sources of self-efficacy in a science methods course for primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9007-0
Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20263
Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., Graham, C. R., & Moskal, P. D. (2021). Blended learning: Research perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037736
Raineri, D. (2001). Virtual laboratories enhance traditional undergraduate biology laboratories. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 29(4), 160-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-8175(01)00060-1
Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, G., & Staver, R. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teacher. Science Education, 80(3), 283-315. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199606)80:3<283::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-A
Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Physics students’ epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310104
Roychoudhury, A., & Roth, W. (1996). Interactions in an open‐inquiry physics laboratory. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 423-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180403
Saputra, H., Suhandi, A., Setiawan, A., & Permanasari, A. (2020). Pre-service teacher’s physics attitude towards physics laboratory in Aceh. Journal of Physics, 1521(2), 022029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022029
Siemens, G., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2015). Preparing for the digital university: A review of the history and current state of distance, blended and online learning. Athabasca University Press.
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to kow. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0004
Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 687-715. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20324
Striegel, A. (2001). Distance education and its impact on computer engineering laboratories. In Proceedings of the 31^st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. F2D-4). https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2001.963707
Stylos, G., Kamtsios, S., & Kotsis, K. T. (2022). Assessment of Greek pre-service primary teachers’ efficacy beliefs in physics teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(1), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.2023959
Stylos, G., Sargioti, A., Mavridis, D., & Kotsis, T. K. (2021). Validation of the thermal concept evaluation test for Greek university students’ misconceptions of thermal concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 43(2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1865587
Tosun, T. (2000). The impact of prior science course experience and achievement on the science teaching self-efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 12(2), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173597
Uzuntiryaki, E. (2008). Exploring the sources of Turkish pre-service chemistry teachers’ chemistry self-efficacy beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(6), 12-28. https://doi.org/10. 14221/ajte.2008v33n6.2
Wang, J., & Hazari, Z. (2018). Promoting high school students’ physics identity through explicit and implicit recognition. Physical Review, 14, 020111. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.020111
Watson, W. E., Michaelsen, L. K., & Sharp, W. (1991). Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 803-809. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.803
Wei, J., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., Lucey, A. D., Zadnik, M., & Lindsay, E. (2019). Understanding interactions in face-to-face and remote undergraduate science laboratories: A literature review. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0015-8
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. M., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
Zacharia, Z. C., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 317-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.001
Zacharia, Z. C., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2008). Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1021-1035. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20260

How to cite this article

APA

Stylos, G., Christonasis, A., Georgopoulos, K., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). The impact of an online physics lab on university students' self-efficacy and understanding of thermal concepts during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(2), em049. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13701

Vancouver

Stylos G, Christonasis A, Georgopoulos K, Kotsis KT. The impact of an online physics lab on university students' self-efficacy and understanding of thermal concepts during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2023;3(2):em049. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13701

AMA

Stylos G, Christonasis A, Georgopoulos K, Kotsis KT. The impact of an online physics lab on university students' self-efficacy and understanding of thermal concepts during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher. 2023;3(2), em049. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13701

Chicago

Stylos, Georgios, Antonios Christonasis, Konstantinos Georgopoulos, and Konstantinos T. Kotsis. "The impact of an online physics lab on university students' self-efficacy and understanding of thermal concepts during COVID-19 pandemic". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher 2023 3 no. 2 (2023): em049. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13701

Harvard

Stylos, G., Christonasis, A., Georgopoulos, K., and Kotsis, K. T. (2023). The impact of an online physics lab on university students' self-efficacy and understanding of thermal concepts during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(2), em049. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13701

MLA

Stylos, Georgios et al. "The impact of an online physics lab on university students' self-efficacy and understanding of thermal concepts during COVID-19 pandemic". Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, vol. 3, no. 2, 2023, em049. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13701